Philippe Tanguy v. David Laux Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership

Court of Appeals of Texas

Philippe Tanguy v. David Laux Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership

DecidedJune 25, 2015

Docket01-13-00501-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Philippe Tanguy v. David Laux Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership (Philippe Tanguy v. David Laux Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philippe Tanguy v. David Laux Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00501-CV

PHILIPPE TANGUY, Appellant

V.

DAVID LAUX, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER OF THE LAUX/DAVIS TAX CONSULTING AND TAX INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, AND THE LAUX/DAVIS TAX CONSULTING AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

Appeal from the 165th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2007-44578A).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on April 1, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the portion of the trial court’s judgment dismissing appellant Philippe Tanguy’s claims against appellees, David Laux, as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership. Accordingly, the Court reverses this portion of the trial court’s judgment and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Philippe Tanguy, pay one half of the appellate costs. The Court orders that the appellees, David Laux, Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership, pay one half of the appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 25, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Jennings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00501-CV

PHILIPPE TANGUY, Appellant

V.

DAVID LAUX, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER OF THE LAUX/DAVIS TAX CONSULTING AND TAX INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, AND THE LAUX/DAVIS TAX CONSULTING AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

Appeal from the 165th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2007-44578A).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on April 1, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the portion of the trial court’s judgment dismissing appellant Philippe Tanguy’s claims against appellees, David Laux, as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership. Accordingly, the Court reverses this portion of the trial court’s judgment and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Philippe Tanguy, pay one half of the appellate costs. The Court orders that the appellees, David Laux, Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership, pay one half of the appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 25, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Jennings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Philippe Tanguy v. David Laux Individually and as General Partner of the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Tax Investment Partnership, and the Laux/Davis Tax Consulting and Investment Partnership, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philippe-tanguy-v-david-laux-individually-and-as-general-partner-of-the-texapp-2015.