Philippe Bien-Aime v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 2025
Docket3D2024-0656
StatusPublished

This text of Philippe Bien-Aime v. State of Florida (Philippe Bien-Aime v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philippe Bien-Aime v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 10, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0656 Lower Tribunal Nos. M23-20772, AIMA2KE, A5D6ZUP, AIMCDOE ________________

Philippe Bien-Aime, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lizzet Martinez, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daniel Colmenares, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Garcia, 346 So. 3d 581, 586 (Fla. 2022) (holding that, despite trial court hearing about uncharged offenses, the trial court did

not commit fundamental error where the record reflects the trial court did not

give any weight to the uncharged conduct, and where the trial court had

before it evidence concerning the circumstances surrounding the charged

offense and the defendant’s prior criminal record when imposing a sentence

within the permissible range).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Philippe Bien-Aime v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philippe-bien-aime-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.