Philipp v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Philipp v. State

400 P.2d 769, 66 Wash. 2d 921, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 947

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedApril 8, 1965

DocketNo. 37339

StatusPublished

This text of 400 P.2d 769 (Philipp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philipp v. State, 400 P.2d 769, 66 Wash. 2d 921, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 947 (Wash. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, appearing pro se, filed in the superior court an instrument entitled “Petition for Declaratory Relief as to Rights Under Contract and Statutes.” It seems to relate to a grievance concerning surety bonds required of the officers and employees of the state chartered credit union and the expulsion of members from such credit union.

. Upon motion, the trial court ordered the petition for declaratory judgment dismissed, apparently upon the ground that appellant’s petition failed to state any claim or grounds for which relief could be granted.

We have examined the entire record, heard appellant’s argument pro se and find no error in the trial court’s ruling. On appeal, we find no statement or claim of grievance upon which the court can grant relief, and, accordingly, affirm the order of dismissal. Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 12(b), RCW vol. 0; 3 Orland, Wash. Prac. 305.

June 4, 1965. Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, appearing pro se, filed in the superior court an instrument entitled “Petition for Declaratory Relief as to Rights Under Contract and Statutes.” It seems to relate to a grievance concerning surety bonds required of the officers and employees of the state chartered credit union and the expulsion of members from such credit union.

. Upon motion, the trial court ordered the petition for declaratory judgment dismissed, apparently upon the ground that appellant’s petition failed to state any claim or grounds for which relief could be granted.

We have examined the entire record, heard appellant’s argument pro se and find no error in the trial court’s ruling. On appeal, we find no statement or claim of grievance upon which the court can grant relief, and, accordingly, affirm the order of dismissal. Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 12(b), RCW vol. 0; 3 Orland, Wash. Prac. 305.

June 4, 1965. Petition for rehearing denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

400 P.2d 769, 66 Wash. 2d 921, 1965 Wash. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philipp-v-state-wash-1965.