Philipp Bros. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 216
United States Customs Court·Decided July 14, 1955·No. No. 59223; protest 157591-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

At the trial, plaintiff offered in evidence the collector’s memorandum, attached to the protest, and the record in C. D. 1543. It appeared from the last paragraph of the collector’s memorandum that the present protest was filed to secure “a refund of the withheld duties paid [in the amount of $38.76], should the protestant be successful in protest No. 7491 of 1949 [court No. 153227-K],” which protest was decided in favor of the plaintiff in Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States (31 Cust. Ct. 45, C. D. 1543). There being no disputed question of fact herein, and the contingency upon which the refund of said $38.76 was withheld having been determined in favor of the plaintiff, it was held that this protest was well taken, and the collector was directed to take action accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philipp Bros. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 216 (cusc 1955).

35 Cust. Ct. 216 (Philipp Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States
31 Cust. Ct. 45 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)