Philipp Bros. v. United States
This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 216 (Philipp Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial, plaintiff offered in evidence the collector’s memorandum, attached to the protest, and the record in C. D. 1543. It appeared from the last paragraph of the collector’s memorandum that the present protest was filed to secure “a refund of the withheld duties paid [in the amount of $38.76], should the protestant be successful in protest No. 7491 of 1949 [court No. 153227-K],” which protest was decided in favor of the plaintiff in Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States (31 Cust. Ct. 45, C. D. 1543). There being no disputed question of fact herein, and the contingency upon which the refund of said $38.76 was withheld having been determined in favor of the plaintiff, it was held that this protest was well taken, and the collector was directed to take action accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Cust. Ct. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philipp-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1955.