Philipe v. Levy

24 Jones & S. 606
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 20, 1888
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Jones & S. 606 (Philipe v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philipe v. Levy, 24 Jones & S. 606 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Opinion

The papers showed that the appellant qualified as executrix in Alabama ; that she had never taken out letters in this state, and that she had not been substituted as a party to the action. (Truax, J., writing), held “ that the appeal should be dismissed.” (Sedgwick, Ch. J., writing), held that the order should be affirmed or the appeal dismissed at the option of the respondents.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Jones & S. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philipe-v-levy-nysuperctnyc-1888.