Philipbar v. Manufacturers Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Philipbar v. Manufacturers Trust Co.

235 A.D. 865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 865 (Philipbar v. Manufacturers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philipbar v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 235 A.D. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order as resettled reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted upon condition that the defendants pay to the plaintiff the sum of fifty dollars costs, and without prejudice to the position of the case upon the Trial Term calendar. We are of opinion that the denial of defendants’ motion to amend and supplement their answer was not a proper exercise of discretion upon the facts contained in this record. There is no claim that the plaintiff can be injured by the service of an amended and supplemental answer. In the event that said payment be not made within five days from the date of entry of the order herein, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order as resettled reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted upon condition that the defendants pay to the plaintiff the sum of fifty dollars costs, and without prejudice to the position of the case upon the Trial Term calendar. We are of opinion that the denial of defendants’ motion to amend and supplement their answer was not a proper exercise of discretion upon the facts contained in this record. There is no claim that the plaintiff can be injured by the service of an amended and supplemental answer. In the event that said payment be not made within five days from the date of entry of the order herein, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philipbar-v-manufacturers-trust-co-nyappdiv-1932.