PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 2019·No. 18-2943·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PHILIP WOOF, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2943 ) ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed July 3, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine M. Catlin, Judge.

Philip Woof, pro se.

Timothy G. Hayes, Lutz, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL (PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.