PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL
This text of PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL (PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
PHILIP WOOF, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2943 ) ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed July 3, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine M. Catlin, Judge.
Philip Woof, pro se.
Timothy G. Hayes, Lutz, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-woof-v-estate-of-gerald-a-giessel-fladistctapp-2019.