PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 2019
Docket18-2943
StatusPublished

This text of PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL (PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

PHILIP WOOF, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2943 ) ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed July 3, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine M. Catlin, Judge.

Philip Woof, pro se.

Timothy G. Hayes, Lutz, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PHILIP WOOF v. ESTATE OF GERALD A. GIESSEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-woof-v-estate-of-gerald-a-giessel-fladistctapp-2019.