Philip Winograd, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

472 N.E.2d 46, 63 N.Y.2d 837, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4649
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (102 AD2d 715).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip Winograd, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 472 N.E.2d 46, 63 N.Y.2d 837, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4649 (N.Y. 1984).

472 N.E.2d 46 (Philip Winograd, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pryce v. Hamilton, Kane, Martin Enterprises, Inc.
10 A.D.3d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)