Philip Whitehead Co. v. Edward Krock Industries, Inc.

193 N.E.2d 690, 346 Mass. 767
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 31, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 N.E.2d 690 (Philip Whitehead Co. v. Edward Krock Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philip Whitehead Co. v. Edward Krock Industries, Inc., 193 N.E.2d 690, 346 Mass. 767 (Mass. 1963).

Opinion

Order dismissing report affirmed. This is an action of contract brought by the corporate plaintiff, the purchaser of a proprietorship from Philip Whitehead, who, as an individual, entered into an oral agreement with the defendant to share the profits and losses of a business venture. _ The District Court judge found that Whitehead “purchased a quarter interest in a transaction involving some woolen mills in Vassalboro, Maine, for the sum of $67,500 for his interest. The profits were to be divided among three persons who had varying interests. The assets were finally disposed of and there remained the sum of $20,000 which should have been distributed. The plaintiff’s share of this would be $5,000.” He also found the property purchased to have been finally liquidated on March 29, 1957, and awarded the plaintiff $5,000 with interest from. April 1, 1957. The defendant claimed a report to the Appellate Division on the denial of certain of his requests. The report was dismissed. There was no error. The joint venture between these parties was at an end save for the distribution to the plaintiff of a quarter share of the fund remaining in the hands of the defendant. The guidelines of Berwin v. Cable, 313 Mass. 431, establish the propriety of the plaintiff’s action at law and the judge’s rulings and findings. The latter are not vitiated by the possibility that there were unsettled accounts between the defendant and a third party in the joint venture. The allowance by the judge of interest on $5,000 from April 1,1957, the approximate date when that amount became due to the plaintiff from the defendant was proper. Winchell v. Plywood Corp. 324 Mass. 171, 181, and cases cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leland Realty Corp. v. Sumner Realty Corp.
1994 Mass. App. Div. 117 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1994)
Watts v. Trojano
1989 Mass. App. Div. 17 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 N.E.2d 690, 346 Mass. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-whitehead-co-v-edward-krock-industries-inc-mass-1963.