Philip v. Catskill Mountain Railway Co.
176 A.D. 925
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1916
DocketNo. 2
StatusPublished
This text of 176 A.D. 925 (Philip v. Catskill Mountain Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Philip v. Catskill Mountain Railway Co., 176 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Kellogg, P. J., and Cochrane, J., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-v-catskill-mountain-railway-co-nyappdiv-1916.