Philip Sinclair, and v. United States of America, and v. Louis D. Pierce and Morton J. Archer, Third-Party
453 F.2d 1377, 29 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 72
Opinion
In this case where a tax refund was sought, issues of fact were resolved against Sinclair.
At issue were whether Sinclair as treasurer of the National 8-Ball Association was a person responsible (duty bound) to pay withholding taxes to the Internal Revenue Service and whether his failure to make the company’s required payment was wilful.
The trial court’s findings were not clearly erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philip Sinclair, and v. United States of America, and v. Louis D. Pierce and Morton J. Archer, Third-Party, 453 F.2d 1377, 29 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 72 (3d Cir. 1972).
453 F.2d 1377 (Philip Sinclair, and v. United States of America, and v. Louis D. Pierce and Morton J. Archer, Third-Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James E. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
453 F.2d 1377 (Fourth Circuit, 1972)