Philip R. Russ v. L. R. Spradling, Et Ux. Charlotte Spradling, Individuals Tejas Tongs, Inc., M.E.G.G., Inc., Texas Corporations, Jody G. Sheets, an Indiv., D. Clay Holcomb, an Indiv., and Hicks, Thomas & Lilienstern, L.L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 6, 2003
Docket07-03-00150-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Philip R. Russ v. L. R. Spradling, Et Ux. Charlotte Spradling, Individuals Tejas Tongs, Inc., M.E.G.G., Inc., Texas Corporations, Jody G. Sheets, an Indiv., D. Clay Holcomb, an Indiv., and Hicks, Thomas & Lilienstern, L.L.P. (Philip R. Russ v. L. R. Spradling, Et Ux. Charlotte Spradling, Individuals Tejas Tongs, Inc., M.E.G.G., Inc., Texas Corporations, Jody G. Sheets, an Indiv., D. Clay Holcomb, an Indiv., and Hicks, Thomas & Lilienstern, L.L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philip R. Russ v. L. R. Spradling, Et Ux. Charlotte Spradling, Individuals Tejas Tongs, Inc., M.E.G.G., Inc., Texas Corporations, Jody G. Sheets, an Indiv., D. Clay Holcomb, an Indiv., and Hicks, Thomas & Lilienstern, L.L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0150-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 6, 2003

_____________________________

PHILIP R. RUSS, AN INDIVIDUAL, APPELLANT

V.

L.R. SPRADLING, ET UX.; CHARLOTTE SPRADLING, INDIVIDUALS;

TEJAS TONGS, INC., M.E.G.G., INC., TEXAS CORPORATIONS,

JODY G. SHEETS, AN INDIVIDUAL; D. CLAY HOLCOMB, AN INDIVIDUAL;

AND HICKS, THOMAS & LILIENSTERN, L.L.P., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 84 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

NO. 33,736; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Philip R. Russ, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on July 29, 2003.  Appellees do not oppose this motion.

Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.   Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  All costs herein having been paid, no order pertaining to the costs is made.  

Phil Johnson

    Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Philip R. Russ v. L. R. Spradling, Et Ux. Charlotte Spradling, Individuals Tejas Tongs, Inc., M.E.G.G., Inc., Texas Corporations, Jody G. Sheets, an Indiv., D. Clay Holcomb, an Indiv., and Hicks, Thomas & Lilienstern, L.L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-r-russ-v-l-r-spradling-et-ux-charlotte-spradling-individuals-texapp-2003.