Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams

556 U.S. 178, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 173 L. Ed. 2d 346, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 2493
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 31, 2009·No. 07-1216·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 556 U. S. ____ (2009) 1

Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________

No. 07–1216 _________________

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., PETITIONER v. MAYOLA

WILLIAMS, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ES-

TATE OF JESSE D. WILLIAMS, DECEASED

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF

OREGON

[March 31, 2009]

PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams, 556 U.S. 178, 129 S. Ct. 1436, 173 L. Ed. 2d 346, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 2493 (2009).

556 U.S. 178 (Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.
415 P.3d 55 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2018)
Schwarz v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
355 P.3d 931 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2015)
Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.
271 P.3d 103 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2011)
Estate of Schwarz ex rel. Schwarz v. Philip Morris Inc.
235 P.3d 668 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2010)