Home/Supreme Court/Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Henley

Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Henley

543 U.S. 952, 125 S. Ct. 376
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 27, 2004
DocketNo. 04A284
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 543 U.S. 952 (Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Henley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Henley, 543 U.S. 952, 125 S. Ct. 376 (2004).

Opinion

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Application for stay of remittitur, presented to Justice O’Connor, and by her referred to the Court, granted pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the mandate of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leslie J. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., a Corporation Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., Individually and as Successor to the American Tobacco Company and Its Predecessor in Interest, British American Tobacco Industries, Plc, Maria Cannata v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc., AKA Philip Morris Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
403 F.3d 631 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A.
403 F.3d 631 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 U.S. 952, 125 S. Ct. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-morris-usa-inc-v-henley-scotus-2004.