Philip Morris Capital Corporation v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 30, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-10378·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PHILIP MORRIS CAPITAL CORPORATION and HNB INVESTMENT CORP., Plaintiffs, v. No. 19 Civ. 10378 (JMF) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Defendant. STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs Philip Morris Capital Corporation and HNB Investment Corporation and Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) (collectively the “Parties”) anticipate that documents, testimony, and information containing or reflecting confidential information, proprietary information, trade secrets, and/or commercially sensitive information may be subject to disclosure or production during the course of discovery in this litigation and request that the Court enter this Order setting forth the conditions for treating, obtaining, and using such information. 1. DEFINITIONS (a) “Common Interest Party” means any individual or entity that has a common interest agreement with any Party to this action, including all of its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and counsel. Defining any individual or entity as a “Common Interest Party” shall not in any way constitute an admission that such Common Interest Party shares any common interest with a Party to this action, and the Parties accordingly reserve their rights to challenge the application of any common interest privilege. (b) “Designating Party” means the Producing Party that causes any Discovery Material to be designated as Protected Material, or, in the case of material produced by a non-party but designated as Protected Material by a Party, the Party that designates such material as Protected Material. (c) “Discovery Material” means all items or information, or any part thereof, including

from any non-party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things), that are produced, disclosed, generated, or otherwise subject to disclosure in connection with discovery in this matter. (d) “Outside Counsel” means those attorneys of the law firms of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Winston & Strawn LLP, Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., and any other attorneys appearing as counsel of record in this action or who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action and who are not employees of a Party, and each of their paralegals, support staff and office staff, as well as any consultants or experts retained in this action. (e) “Party” means any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors,

employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel and their support staffs. (f) “Producing Party” means any Party or non-party entity that discloses or produces any Discovery Material in this action. (g) “Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as provided for in this Order. (h) “Receiving Party” means any Party that receives or has access to Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 2. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS (a) Absent an agreement by the Parties in writing or an order from a court of competent jurisdiction, Protected Material designated under the terms of this Protective Order shall be used by a Receiving Party solely for this litigation and shall not be used directly or indirectly for any other purpose whatsoever. Disclosure of Protected Material by the Receiving Party is

prohibited except as expressly provided in this Order. (b) The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures during discovery. Designations under this Order shall be made with care and shall not be made absent a good faith belief that the designated material satisfies the criteria set forth herein. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that designated material does not qualify for protection at all, or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation. 3. COMPUTATION OF TIME The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order shall be governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(a) and 6(d).

4. SCOPE (a) The protections conferred by this Order shall cover all Protected Material, including any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or other compilations thereof. Such protections shall also extend to any pleadings, testimony, conversations, or presentations by any Party or its counsel that might discuss, reflect, or reveal Protected Material. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions herein, nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose. (c) This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Producing Party to seek further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including,

without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all. 5. DURATION During the pendency of this action and continuing after the termination thereof, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Producing Party and, if different, a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL (a) Basic Principles. All Protected Material shall be used by the Receiving Party solely for this litigation and the preparation and trial in this case, or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever, including without limitation any other litigation or any business or competitive purpose. Protected Material disclosed or produced to the

Receiving Party shall not be distributed, disclosed, or made available to anyone except as expressly provided in this Order. (b) Secure Storage. Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. (c) Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way the use or disclosure of Protected Material by a Receiving Party (a) that is or has become publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (b) that was previously produced, disclosed, and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an obligation of confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (c) with the consent of the Producing Party and, if different, the Designating Party; or (d) pursuant to Order of the Court. 7. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL (a) Any Producing Party may designate its own Discovery Material with either of the

following designations as provided for herein: “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” In the case of Discovery Material produced by a non-party (including without limitation the Common Interest Party), a Party may make these designations, in writing, to the other Parties and the non-party, within thirty (30) days after the Discovery Materials are produced by the non-party. (b) Documents and Tangible Things. Documents and tangible things that meet the requirements for the confidentiality designations listed in Paragraphs 8(a) and 9(a) may be so designated by placing the appropriate designation on every page of the written material prior to production or by labeling or otherwise communicating the appropriate designation where it is not practicable to place the appropriate designation on each page, such as in the case of electronic,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip Morris Capital Corporation v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Philip Morris Capital Corporation v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Philip Morris Capital Corporation v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)