Philip J. Stoddard v. Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners

229 F. App'x 911
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 2007
Docket07-10546
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 229 F. App'x 911 (Philip J. Stoddard v. Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philip J. Stoddard v. Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners, 229 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Philip J. Stoddard sued the Florida Board of Bar Examiners (FBBE), the Honorable R. Fred Lewis, and several members of the FBBE, in their personal and official capacities. Stoddard’s complaint alleges claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 12213 (the ADA), and Article 1 Section 10 of the United States Constitution. The gravamen of Stoddard’s lawsuit is that Defendants violated his rights by refusing to grant him admission to the Florida Bar. The district court dismissed each of the claims against each of the Defendants.

After a thorough review of the record and the parties’ briefs on appeal, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Case
M.D. Alabama, 2026
MULLANE v. ALMON
N.D. Florida, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 F. App'x 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-j-stoddard-v-florida-bd-of-bar-examiners-ca11-2007.