Philip Hano & Co. v. Gretsch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Philip Hano & Co. v. Gretsch

134 N.Y.S. 811

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 134 N.Y.S. 811 (Philip Hano & Co. v. Gretsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philip Hano & Co. v. Gretsch, 134 N.Y.S. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff instituted one action against the defendant in the City Court of the City of-New York, and subsequently instituted another action against the defendant in the Municipal Court of the City of New York. The causes of action alleged in these two [812]*812actions are between the same parties, are brought upon the same written instrument, and the issues are substantially the same. In view of the circumstances disclosed above, we are of the opinion that the motion should have been granted, and the two actions consolidated.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff instituted one action against the defendant in the City Court of the City of-New York, and subsequently instituted another action against the defendant in the Municipal Court of the City of New York. The causes of action alleged in these two [812]*812actions are between the same parties, are brought upon the same written instrument, and the issues are substantially the same. In view of the circumstances disclosed above, we are of the opinion that the motion should have been granted, and the two actions consolidated.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 N.Y.S. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-hano-co-v-gretsch-nyappterm-1912.