Philip Haibach Contracting Co. v. Hornung
This text of 113 A. 365 (Philip Haibach Contracting Co. v. Hornung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of its rule foi judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. We have frequently held and recently repeated that unless we can say the action of the court in refusing judgment on rules of this character is clearly erroneous and free from doubt, its order will not be disturbed: Brown et al. v. Unger et al., 269 Pa. 471. Testing the pleadings in this case by that rule we are not convinced the action of the court below should be disturbed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 A. 365, 270 Pa. 350, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-haibach-contracting-co-v-hornung-pa-1921.