Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite

215 A.D.2d 179, 626 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4940
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 A.D.2d 179 (Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite, 215 A.D.2d 179, 626 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered October 29, 1993 and February 22, 1994, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment on condition that they post a bond, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Requiring defendants to post a bond would not deprive them of their day in court, it being clear that defendants have property that can be liquidated, and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion (see, Rubin v Payne, 103 AD2d 946). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz v. First Call Ambulette Service Corp.
243 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D.2d 179, 626 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-glick-supply-co-v-steve-satterwhite-nyappdiv-1995.