Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite

215 A.D.2d 179, 626 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4940

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered October 29, 1993 and February 22, 1994, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment on condition that they post a bond, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Requiring defendants to post a bond would not deprive them of their day in court, it being clear that defendants have property that can be liquidated, and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion (see, Rubin v Payne, 103 AD2d 946). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered October 29, 1993 and February 22, 1994, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment on condition that they post a bond, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Requiring defendants to post a bond would not deprive them of their day in court, it being clear that defendants have property that can be liquidated, and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion (see, Rubin v Payne, 103 AD2d 946). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite, 215 A.D.2d 179, 626 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

215 A.D.2d 179 (Philip Glick Supply Co. v. Steve Satterwhite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related