Philip G. Seitner v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Philip G. Seitner v. United States

262 F.2d 710, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 399

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1958

Docket14547_1

StatusPublished

This text of 262 F.2d 710 (Philip G. Seitner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philip G. Seitner v. United States, 262 F.2d 710, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 399 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us so to apply the rule of Guarro v. United States, 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 237 F.2d 578, as to reverse the Municipal Court of Appeals and ultimately his conviction in the Municipal Court of a charge of assault. Without necessarily approving the opinion of the Municipal Court of Appeals, Seitner v. United States, D.C.Mun.App.1958, 143 A.2d 101, we cannot say on the record before us that there was error in the conviction itself.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us so to apply the rule of Guarro v. United States, 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 237 F.2d 578, as to reverse the Municipal Court of Appeals and ultimately his conviction in the Municipal Court of a charge of assault. Without necessarily approving the opinion of the Municipal Court of Appeals, Seitner v. United States, D.C.Mun.App.1958, 143 A.2d 101, we cannot say on the record before us that there was error in the conviction itself.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 F.2d 710, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-g-seitner-v-united-states-cadc-1958.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack