Philip G. Seitner v. United States
262 F.2d 710, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 399
Opinions
Appellant asks us so to apply the rule of Guarro v. United States, 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 237 F.2d 578, as to reverse the Municipal Court of Appeals and ultimately his conviction in the Municipal Court of a charge of assault. Without necessarily approving the opinion of the Municipal Court of Appeals, Seitner v. United States, D.C.Mun.App.1958, 143 A.2d 101, we cannot say on the record before us that there was error in the conviction itself.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philip G. Seitner v. United States, 262 F.2d 710, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 399 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
262 F.2d 710 (Philip G. Seitner v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ernesto Guarro v. United States
237 F.2d 578 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
Seitner v. United States
143 A.2d 101 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1958)