Philip Fote v. NH, State of

District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided June 24, 2026·No. 1:26-cv-00013·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Philip Fote

v. Case No. 26-cv-13-LM-TSM

NH, State of

ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated April 17, 2026. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.”). The case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is denied as moot. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the case.

____________________________ Landya B. McCafferty United States District Judge

Date: June 24, 2026

cc: Philip Fote, pro se Jonathan Fote (courtesy copy)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip Fote v. NH, State of, (D.N.H. 2026).

Philip Fote v. NH, State of (Philip Fote v. NH, State of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

School Union No. 37 v. United National Insurance
617 F.3d 554 (First Circuit, 2010)
Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno
842 F.3d 163 (First Circuit, 2016)
Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc.
62 F.4th 1 (First Circuit, 2023)