Philip E. Roberts v. United States
This text of 3 F. App'x 570 (Philip E. Roberts v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Philip Eugene Roberts appeals the district court’s dismissal of Roberts’s mandamus petition seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Internal Revenue Service. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude the action was properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a) (except as provided, no suit for purpose of restraining assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court); 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) (declaratory judgment not available for cases involving federal taxes); Warren v. United States, 874 F.2d 280, 281-82 (5th Cir.1989) (5 U.S.C. § 702 did not waive sovereign immunity where taxpayers sought declaratory relief related to penalty-of-perjury clause on tax return). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 F. App'x 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-e-roberts-v-united-states-ca8-2001.