Philip Blum & Co. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 361, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1623
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1950
DocketNo. 53997; protests 132311-K/1225, etc. (Chicago)
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 361 (Philip Blum & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philip Blum & Co. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 361, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1623 (cusc 1950).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Cust. Ct. 361, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-blum-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.