Philip B. Chambers and Gladys Chambers v. Colonial Pipeline Company

408 F.2d 678, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13118
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 25, 1969·No. 19038_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants filed a complaint in the District Court seeking to set aside a State Court judgment entered in an eminent domain proceeding involving a pipeline right-of-way. The same parties are before this Court who were litigants in the State Court action. The protractéd State litigation began in 1962.

District Judge Frank W. Wilson granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, applying the doctrine of res judicata. In his opinion the District Judge said:

“* -x- * there must be an end to litigation. Without it [the doctrine of res judicata], litigation would be endless.
“This litigation, too, must at some point end. It appears from the undisputed record that this is such a point.” This case has been assigned to a panel

pursuant to Rule 3(e) of the Supplementary Rules of this Court. The appeal is dismissed as frivolous and completely without merit under Rule 9 of the Supplementary Rules of this Court. Moist v. Belk, 380 F.2d 721 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 960, 88 S.Ct. 338, 19 L.Ed.2d 369.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip B. Chambers and Gladys Chambers v. Colonial Pipeline Company, 408 F.2d 678, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13118 (6th Cir. 1969).

408 F.2d 678 (Philip B. Chambers and Gladys Chambers v. Colonial Pipeline Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Metropolitan Development Housing Agency
857 F. Supp. 597 (M.D. Tennessee, 1994)