Philip B. Chambers and Gladys Chambers v. Colonial Pipeline Company
This text of 408 F.2d 678 (Philip B. Chambers and Gladys Chambers v. Colonial Pipeline Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants filed a complaint in the District Court seeking to set aside a State Court judgment entered in an eminent domain proceeding involving a pipeline right-of-way. The same parties are before this Court who were litigants in the State Court action. The protractéd State litigation began in 1962.
District Judge Frank W. Wilson granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, applying the doctrine of res judicata. In his opinion the District Judge said:
“* -x- * there must be an end to litigation. Without it [the doctrine of res judicata], litigation would be endless.
“This litigation, too, must at some point end. It appears from the undisputed record that this is such a point.” This case has been assigned to a panel
pursuant to Rule 3(e) of the Supplementary Rules of this Court. The appeal is dismissed as frivolous and completely without merit under Rule 9 of the Supplementary Rules of this Court. Moist v. Belk, 380 F.2d 721 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 960, 88 S.Ct. 338, 19 L.Ed.2d 369.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F.2d 678, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-b-chambers-and-gladys-chambers-v-colonial-pipeline-company-ca6-1969.