Philip Anthony Cox v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Philip Anthony Cox v. State

DecidedMay 12, 2016

Docket14-15-00755-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Philip Anthony Cox v. State (Philip Anthony Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philip Anthony Cox v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion Granted and Order filed May 12, 2016

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00755-CR ____________

PHILIP ANTHONY COX, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1450528

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion to review the record so he may file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 180th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before May 27, 2016; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within 30 days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI