Philhower v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Philhower v. State

701 So. 2d 655, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13143, 1997 WL 715733

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 1997

DocketNo. 97-3059

StatusPublished

This text of 701 So. 2d 655 (Philhower v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philhower v. State, 701 So. 2d 655, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13143, 1997 WL 715733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied appellant’s rule 3.800 motion to correct his illegal sentence, even though the state responded to the motion by agreeing that it should be granted. The state has also conceded to this court that the motion should have been granted, and we therefore reverse and remand for correction of the sentence pursuant to the state’s response to our order to show cause.

STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied appellant’s rule 3.800 motion to correct his illegal sentence, even though the state responded to the motion by agreeing that it should be granted. The state has also conceded to this court that the motion should have been granted, and we therefore reverse and remand for correction of the sentence pursuant to the state’s response to our order to show cause.

STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 So. 2d 655, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13143, 1997 WL 715733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philhower-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.