Philbrick v. Philbrick

Supreme Court of Vermont

Philbrick v. Philbrick

27 Vt. 786

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 15, 1856·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

Upon the authority of Moffatt v. Moffat, 10 Vt., we think the irregularities in this case are fatal, and that we could not regard the appearance of the libellee, at the taking of the testimony, as any waiver. He was justified in acting upon the sure side, in any contingency, as he could not know, that the court would not sustain the petition, notwithstanding these objections.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

Upon the authority of Moffatt v. Moffat, 10 Vt., we think the irregularities in this case are fatal, and that we could not regard the appearance of the libellee, at the taking of the testimony, as any waiver. He was justified in acting upon the sure side, in any contingency, as he could not know, that the court would not sustain the petition, notwithstanding these objections.

Petition dismissed.

Philbrick v. Philbrick, 27 Vt. 786 (Vt. 1856).

Pincite

27 Vt. 786 (Philbrick v. Philbrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related