Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson

3 Walker 143

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 15, 1873

DocketNo. 263

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Walker 143 (Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson, 3 Walker 143 (Pa. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on January 26, 1874, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

The first and second errors are wholly without merit. The third is founded on a misconception of the mode of proving [145]*145the value of land. The rule laid down in East Penna; Railroad vs. Heister, 40 Pa., 53, will discover this. That case has been recognized in two cases decided at the last terra in the Western District at Pittsburg.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on January 26, 1874, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

The first and second errors are wholly without merit. The third is founded on a misconception of the mode of proving [145]*145the value of land. The rule laid down in East Penna; Railroad vs. Heister, 40 Pa., 53, will discover this. That case has been recognized in two cases decided at the last terra in the Western District at Pittsburg.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Walker 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-wilmington-baltimore-r-r-v-patterson-pa-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack