Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson

3 Walker 143

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 15, 1873·No. No. 263·Published

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on January 26, 1874, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

The first and second errors are wholly without merit. The third is founded on a misconception of the mode of proving [145] the value of land. The rule laid down in East Penna; Railroad vs. Heister, 40 Pa., 53, will discover this. That case has been recognized in two cases decided at the last terra in the Western District at Pittsburg.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on January 26, 1874, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

The first and second errors are wholly without merit. The third is founded on a misconception of the mode of proving [145] the value of land. The rule laid down in East Penna; Railroad vs. Heister, 40 Pa., 53, will discover this. That case has been recognized in two cases decided at the last terra in the Western District at Pittsburg.

Judgment affirmed.

Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson, 3 Walker 143 (Pa. 1873).

Pincite

3 Walker 143 (Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore R. R. v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related