Philadelphia v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia v. Philadelphia

90 A. 573, 244 Pa. 224, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 747

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 16, 1914·No. Appeals, Nos. 329 and 330·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We concur in the findings stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas that the contract of the city with the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company relieved the defendant, the Girard Estate, for whom it is trustee, from the obligation to pay for the street paving in front of its property and that the right of the use-plaintiff is no higher than that of the city, in whose right the claims were filed. ■

The orders discharging the rules for judgment are •affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We concur in the findings stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas that the contract of the city with the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company relieved the defendant, the Girard Estate, for whom it is trustee, from the obligation to pay for the street paving in front of its property and that the right of the use-plaintiff is no higher than that of the city, in whose right the claims were filed. ■

The orders discharging the rules for judgment are •affirmed.

Philadelphia v. Philadelphia, 90 A. 573, 244 Pa. 224, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 747 (Pa. 1914).

Pincite

90 A. 573 (Philadelphia v. Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related