Philadelphia v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia v. Philadelphia

90 A. 573, 244 Pa. 224, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 747

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 16, 1914

DocketAppeals, Nos. 329 and 330

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 A. 573 (Philadelphia v. Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philadelphia v. Philadelphia, 90 A. 573, 244 Pa. 224, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 747 (Pa. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We concur in the findings stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas that the contract of the city with the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company relieved the defendant, the Girard Estate, for whom it is trustee, from the obligation to pay for the street paving in front of its property and that the right of the use-plaintiff is no higher than that of the city, in whose right the claims were filed. ■

The orders discharging the rules for judgment are •affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We concur in the findings stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas that the contract of the city with the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company relieved the defendant, the Girard Estate, for whom it is trustee, from the obligation to pay for the street paving in front of its property and that the right of the use-plaintiff is no higher than that of the city, in whose right the claims were filed. ■

The orders discharging the rules for judgment are •affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A. 573, 244 Pa. 224, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-v-philadelphia-pa-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack