Philadelphia v. MacPherson
This text of 21 A. 227 (Philadelphia v. MacPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case does not require discussion. It is sufficient to say that the plaintiff below made out a prima facie case, and the defendant offered nothing to rebut it. The matters alleged by her learned counsel, and which are indicated to some extent in his points, were matters of defence, so far as they had any bearing upon the case; and, no proof having been offered in their support, the court below committed no error in disregarding them.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 A. 227, 140 Pa. 5, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-v-macpherson-pa-1891.