Philadelphia v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia v. Johnson

57 A. 1114, 208 Pa. 645, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 819

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 11, 1904·No. Appeal, No. 274·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Under the power of attorney delivered in this case a judgment was entered June 5, 1902. As the learned judge of the Superior Court has clearly shown, on both reason and authority, that act was an exhaustion of the power conferred by the warrant. The confession of the second judgment on the same warrant was a nullity.

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Smith in his opinion filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Under the power of attorney delivered in this case a judgment was entered June 5, 1902. As the learned judge of the Superior Court has clearly shown, on both reason and authority, that act was an exhaustion of the power conferred by the warrant. The confession of the second judgment on the same warrant was a nullity.

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Smith in his opinion filed.

Philadelphia v. Johnson, 57 A. 1114, 208 Pa. 645, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 819 (Pa. 1904).

Pincite

57 A. 1114 (Philadelphia v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related