Philadelphia v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia v. Johnson

57 A. 1114, 208 Pa. 645, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 819

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 11, 1904

DocketAppeal, No. 274

StatusPublished

Cited by30 cases

This text of 57 A. 1114 (Philadelphia v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philadelphia v. Johnson, 57 A. 1114, 208 Pa. 645, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 819 (Pa. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Under the power of attorney delivered in this case a judgment was entered June 5, 1902. As the learned judge of the Superior Court has clearly shown, on both reason and authority, that act was an exhaustion of the power conferred by the warrant. The confession of the second judgment on the same warrant was a nullity.

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Smith in his opinion filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Under the power of attorney delivered in this case a judgment was entered June 5, 1902. As the learned judge of the Superior Court has clearly shown, on both reason and authority, that act was an exhaustion of the power conferred by the warrant. The confession of the second judgment on the same warrant was a nullity.

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Smith in his opinion filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A. 1114, 208 Pa. 645, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-v-johnson-pa-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack