Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds

120 S.E. 703, 31 Ga. App. 315, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 929
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 7, 1923·No. 13847·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

On this bill of exceptions of an insurance company to an order of a superior court, under the act approved August 14, 1916 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 128), appointing an umpire to ascertain certain damages by fire under a fire insurance policy, the Supreme Court having held, in answer to questions certified to it by this court, that such order “is not a judgment that can be reviewed by writ of error, and the Court of Appeals has not the power to entertain an assignment of error based thereon,” the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be granted. 156 Ga. 773 (120 S. E. 102).

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds, 120 S.E. 703, 31 Ga. App. 315, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 929 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

120 S.E. 703 (Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds
120 S.E. 102 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)