Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds

120 S.E. 703, 31 Ga. App. 315, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 929
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 7, 1923
Docket13847
StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 703 (Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds, 120 S.E. 703, 31 Ga. App. 315, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 929 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

On this bill of exceptions of an insurance company to an order of a superior court, under the act approved August 14, 1916 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 128), appointing an umpire to ascertain certain damages by fire under a fire insurance policy, the Supreme Court having held, in answer to questions certified to it by this court, that such order “is not a judgment that can be reviewed by writ of error, and the Court of Appeals has not the power to entertain an assignment of error based thereon,” the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be granted. 156 Ga. 773 (120 S. E. 102).

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philadelphia Underwriters v. Folds
120 S.E. 102 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.E. 703, 31 Ga. App. 315, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-underwriters-v-folds-gactapp-1923.