Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero

635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 28, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 635 A.2d 1040 (Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero, 635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7 (Pa. 1994).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision in this case.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.
152 A.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Tigue v. BASALYGA
304 A.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Huston v. Campanini
346 A.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-suburban-development-corp-v-chickelero-pa-1994.