Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero
635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7
This text of 635 A.2d 1040 (Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero, 635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7 (Pa. 1994).
Opinions
ORDER
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.
152 A.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Tigue v. BASALYGA
304 A.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Huston v. Campanini
346 A.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-suburban-development-corp-v-chickelero-pa-1994.