Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero

635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 28, 1994·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision in this case.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero, 635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7 (Pa. 1994).

635 A.2d 1040 (Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.
152 A.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Tigue v. BASALYGA
304 A.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Huston v. Campanini
346 A.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)