Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero
635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7
Opinions
ORDER
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero, 635 A.2d 1040, 535 Pa. 421, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 7 (Pa. 1994).
635 A.2d 1040 (Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp. v. Chickelero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.
152 A.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Tigue v. BASALYGA
304 A.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Huston v. Campanini
346 A.2d 258 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)