Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Buckstaff Bros. Manufacturing
This text of 84 N.W. 416 (Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Buckstaff Bros. Manufacturing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On a motion to confirm a sale of real estate made by the sheriff in pursuance of a decree entered in foreclosure proceedings, objections were interposed on the ground that the order of sale was not returned within sixty days. A failure to return an order of sale in the execution of a decree in foreclosure proceedings within sixty days is no sufficient reason for withholding confirmation of a sale made thereunder. Amoskeag Savings Bank v. Robbins, 53 Nebr., 776; Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Hutchins, 61 Nebr., 2, decided at the present sifting.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.W. 416, 61 Neb. 54, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-mortgage-trust-co-v-buckstaff-bros-manufacturing-neb-1900.