Philadelphia Medical Publishing Co. v. Wolfenden

86 A. 849, 239 Pa. 262, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 549
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 3, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 171·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order discharging a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action was by a corporation, of which the defendant became an officer, to recover on an oral agreement alleged to have been made by him to subscribe for $5,000.00 of the stock of the corporation when a charter was obtained. It is averred in the affidavit of defense that the defendant’s agreement was to invest $1,000.00 in the stock of the corporation and that he never agreed to subscribe for a larger amount of stock. This denial went to the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim, and if established by proof, would defeat a recovery. The issue raised was for the jury.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philadelphia Medical Publishing Co. v. Wolfenden, 86 A. 849, 239 Pa. 262, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 549 (Pa. 1913).

86 A. 849 (Philadelphia Medical Publishing Co. v. Wolfenden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.