Philadelphia Fire & Inland Navigation Company's Appeal

2 Pa. 263, 1845 Pa. LEXIS 328
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 10, 1845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

The very point before us was ruled at tire last term at Pittsburgh, in Tiernan v. Dougherly, in which it was held, that the lien of a judgment may be revived as -well by a scire facias post annum et diem as by the writ directed in the act of 1798; and this, on the ground that it would produce a scene of general ruin to decide otherwise. Though the practice of the profession was for many years irregular in this respect, we dare not disturb it, and the point must be considered as at rest.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philadelphia Fire & Inland Navigation Company's Appeal, 2 Pa. 263, 1845 Pa. LEXIS 328 (Pa. 1845).

2 Pa. 263 (Philadelphia Fire & Inland Navigation Company's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beck v. Finnefrock
72 Pa. Super. 537 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Ramsey v. Ramsey
15 Pa. Super. 214 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)