Philadelphia Carpet Company v. Federal Trade Commission

Third Circuit

Philadelphia Carpet Company v. Federal Trade Commission

342 F.2d 994, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6056, 1965 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,412

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 1965

Docket14888

StatusPublished

This text of 342 F.2d 994 (Philadelphia Carpet Company v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philadelphia Carpet Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 342 F.2d 994, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6056, 1965 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,412 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission against respondent for violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (§ 2(a) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S. C. 813(a)).

After an examination of the record and a consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel we are satisfied that the order of the Federal Trade Commission was fully justified, for the reasons stated in the excellent opinion of Commissioner Dixon: No. 7635, FTC, February 10, 1964. On that opinion the order of the Commission will be affirmed and obedience to its terms will be ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission against respondent for violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (§ 2(a) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S. C. 813(a)).

After an examination of the record and a consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel we are satisfied that the order of the Federal Trade Commission was fully justified, for the reasons stated in the excellent opinion of Commissioner Dixon: No. 7635, FTC, February 10, 1964. On that opinion the order of the Commission will be affirmed and obedience to its terms will be ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 F.2d 994, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6056, 1965 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-carpet-company-v-federal-trade-commission-ca3-1965.