Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. United States

Court of Claims

Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 537, 1926 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 361

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedNovember 1, 1926

DocketNo. A-113

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ct. Cl. 537 (Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. United States, 62 Ct. Cl. 537, 1926 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 361 (cc 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Hat, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $138,687.15. This suit is based upon an express contract had between a representative of the plaintiff and Gen. J. Franklin Bell, acting for the Secretary of War. It is conceded that General Bell had authority to contract for the Secretary of War, and the only issues herein involved are the number of feet of track constructed by the plaintiff for the benefit of the United States under the provisions of the contract above referred to. That contract is set out in Finding IV, and it is not necessary to repeat its terms and provisions here.

We have carefully considered the evidence adduced by both parties to this suit and have arrived at what we are of opinion is a fair and reasonable compensation to the plaintiff for the tracks constructed by it for the benefit of the Government under the terms of the contract above referred to.

A judgment will be awarded the plaintiff in the sum of $35,063.64. It is so ordered.

Graham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice, concur. Moss, Judge, took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hat, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $138,687.15. This suit is based upon an express contract had between a representative of the plaintiff and Gen. J. Franklin Bell, acting for the Secretary of War. It is conceded that General Bell had authority to contract for the Secretary of War, and the only issues herein involved are the number of feet of track constructed by the plaintiff for the benefit of the United States under the provisions of the contract above referred to. That contract is set out in Finding IV, and it is not necessary to repeat its terms and provisions here.

We have carefully considered the evidence adduced by both parties to this suit and have arrived at what we are of opinion is a fair and reasonable compensation to the plaintiff for the tracks constructed by it for the benefit of the Government under the terms of the contract above referred to.

A judgment will be awarded the plaintiff in the sum of $35,063.64. It is so ordered.

Graham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice, concur. Moss, Judge, took no part in the decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Ct. Cl. 537, 1926 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-baltimore-washington-railroad-v-united-states-cc-1926.