Phila. & Reading R. R. v. Snowdon
30 A. 1129, 166 Pa. 236, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1183
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 53·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We are satisfied from an examination of this record that the court was right in adjudging the affidavit of defence insufficient to carry the case to the jury, and hence there was no error in entering judgment for the plaintiff. There is no merit in either-of the specifications of error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phila. & Reading R. R. v. Snowdon, 30 A. 1129, 166 Pa. 236, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1183 (Pa. 1895).
30 A. 1129 (Phila. & Reading R. R. v. Snowdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McBride v. Bartol
5 Pa. D. & C. 71 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Edward F. Gerber Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
216 F. 980 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1914)
King v. Security Co.
88 A. 789 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)