Phila. & Reading R. R. v. Snowdon
30 A. 1129, 166 Pa. 236, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1183
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 21, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 53
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 30 A. 1129 (Phila. & Reading R. R. v. Snowdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Phila. & Reading R. R. v. Snowdon, 30 A. 1129, 166 Pa. 236, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1183 (Pa. 1895).
Opinion
We are satisfied from an examination of this record that the court was right in adjudging the affidavit of defence insufficient to carry the case to the jury, and hence there was no error in entering judgment for the plaintiff. There is no merit in either-of the specifications of error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McBride v. Bartol
5 Pa. D. & C. 71 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Edward F. Gerber Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
216 F. 980 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1914)
King v. Security Co.
88 A. 789 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 A. 1129, 166 Pa. 236, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phila-reading-r-r-v-snowdon-pa-1895.