Phila. ex rel. O'Rourke v. Kelly
31 A. 47, 166 Pa. 207, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1178
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 494·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
An examination of the record, with special reference to the several specifications, has failed to convince us that there is any substantial error in the rulings of-the learned trial judge. Neither of the specifications is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phila. ex rel. O'Rourke v. Kelly, 31 A. 47, 166 Pa. 207, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1178 (Pa. 1895).
31 A. 47 (Phila. ex rel. O'Rourke v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
President of the Roman Catholic Church of Ascension v. Perché
36 La. Ann. 160 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1884)