Phila. Dairy, C., Inc. v. Summit, C., Inc.

167 A. 667, 113 N.J. Eq. 458, 1933 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 93
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedJuly 28, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 167 A. 667 (Phila. Dairy, C., Inc. v. Summit, C., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phila. Dairy, C., Inc. v. Summit, C., Inc., 167 A. 667, 113 N.J. Eq. 458, 1933 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 93 (N.J. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

The matter sub judice is the distribution of the estate of the defendant-insolvent corporation in possession of the receiver herein and a determination of priority and preference of claimants.

The receivership estate is insufficient to pay expenses of the administration of the receivership and all allowed claims in full; therefore, the expenses of the administration of the receivership must first be paid, next in order will be claims of employes of the defendant for wages due to them for work performed and services rendered within two months next preceding the filing of the bill of complaint herein, then, franchise taxes, municipal taxes, claim of landlord against the corporation for not exceeding one year's rent, then, claims of other preferred creditors, and lastly, claims of general creditors. Expenses of the administration of the reveivership comprehend allowances to the receiver and his counsel, master's fees, appraisers' fees, auditors' fees, rent for use and occupation of the store premises by the receiver, claims for merchandise, electricity and gas, and wage claims of persons employed by the receiver, in the conduct by him of the business of the defendant under authority of the court. Counsel for various claimants urged that there should be a pro-rating of the expenses of the receivership and the claims *Page 460 of the various claimants. Such claim is untenable in the mattersub judice. The well established rule is to pay first the general expenses of the receivership and then the allowed claims in the order of their priority. Albert Kernahan, Inc., v. Franklin Arms, Inc., 107 N.J. Eq. 468; Walser v. NorthernValley Building Corp., 109 N.J. Eq. 126; Spark v. LaReine HotelCorp., 112 N.J. Eq. 398; sections 85 and 86 of the GeneralCorporation act; 2 Comp. Stat. p. 1652.

I will advise an order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In RE HOLLY KNITWEAR v. Solomon
280 A.2d 504 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Parks v. Central Door & Lumber Co.
102 P.2d 706 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1940)
Bowes v. United States
11 A.2d 720 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)
Decorative Util. C. v. National
196 A. 381 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
Supreme Fuel v. Peerless Plush
175 A. 358 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Bea v. Turner Co.
169 A. 832 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Geran v. N.J. Sand and Gravel Co.
168 A. 817 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Martini v. Passaic Men's Shop, Inc.
168 A. 767 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A. 667, 113 N.J. Eq. 458, 1933 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phila-dairy-c-inc-v-summit-c-inc-njch-1933.