PHI Air Medical, LLC v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company
This text of PHI Air Medical, LLC v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company (PHI Air Medical, LLC v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
ON REMAND
NO. 03-17-00081-CV
PHI Air Medical, LLC, Appellant
v.
Texas Mutual Insurance Company; Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; TASB Risk Management Fund; Transportation Insurance Company; Truck Insurance Exchange; Twin City Fire Insurance Company; Valley Forge Insurance Company; Zenith Insurance Company; and Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, Appellees
FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-GN-15-004940, THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant PHI Air Medical, LLC, appealed the trial court’s judgment in favor of
Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk
Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City
Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company, and Zenith Insurance Company
(collectively “the Insurers”). This Court reversed the trial court’s judgment. See PHI Air Med.,
LLC v. Texas Mut. Ins., 549 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018). The Insurers and the
Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation appealed, and the Texas Supreme Court reversed this Court’s decision and remanded to this Court. Texas Mut. Ins. v. PHI Air
Med., LLC, __ S.W.3d __, 2020 WL 3477002 (Tex. June 26, 2020). PHI then filed a petition for
writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).
PHI has now filed an unopposed motion to stay proceedings until after SCOTUS
has reviewed the petition. We grant the motion and abate the appeal pending review by
SCOTUS. The parties are instructed to notify this Court within thirty days of SCOTUS’s
decision regarding whether to grant the petition. Failure to timely comply may result in the case
being dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Abated
Filed: December 17, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PHI Air Medical, LLC v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phi-air-medical-llc-v-texas-mutual-insurance-company-hartford-texapp-2020.