Phenix v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Phenix v. Gladden

443 P.2d 176, 250 Or. 424, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 569

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJune 26, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 443 P.2d 176 (Phenix v. Gladden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phenix v. Gladden, 443 P.2d 176, 250 Or. 424, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 569 (Or. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CUEIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a decision of the trial court denying post-conviction relief. The sole cause for relief argued on appeal is the length of the sentence imposed on plaintiff.

We think it unnecessary to state the facts and arguments. The sentence imposed, although seemingly long, does not appear to have been “due to improper motives or so greatly disproportionate to the circumstances in the commission of the offense as to shock the conscience of fair-minded men.” State v. Montgomery, 1964, 287 Or 593, 595, 392 P2d 642, 643.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CUEIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a decision of the trial court denying post-conviction relief. The sole cause for relief argued on appeal is the length of the sentence imposed on plaintiff.

We think it unnecessary to state the facts and arguments. The sentence imposed, although seemingly long, does not appear to have been “due to improper motives or so greatly disproportionate to the circumstances in the commission of the offense as to shock the conscience of fair-minded men.” State v. Montgomery, 1964, 287 Or 593, 595, 392 P2d 642, 643.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 P.2d 176, 250 Or. 424, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phenix-v-gladden-or-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack