Phenix (Raymond) v. State
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
SUPREME Comm OF NEVADA
an mm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAYMOND GENE PHENIX,
Petitioner,
‘ WLEB
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 66928
DEC 1 l] 301‘:
ERA Ec UNE‘EMAN ELE E ‘ R m .J%WVL—
DEPUTV CLERK.
ORDER DENYING PETITJON
This is a proper person petition for extraordinary relief. Petitioner challenges the resolution of his direct appeal in Phenix v. State, 114 Nev. 116, 954 P.2d 7'39 (1998), and the appellate proceedings. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without
deciding upon the merits of any claime raised therein} we decline to
exercise original jurisdiction in thiematter. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED“
Pickering
cc: Raymond Gene Phenix Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phenix (Raymond) v. State (Phenix (Raymond) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.