Phenix City v. County Board of Education

108 So. 589, 214 Ala. 432, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 126
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 15, 1926·No. 4 Div. 273.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

This bill was filed seeking injunctive relief pending appeal from judgment of the circuit court denying the issuance of a writ of mandamus. 22 Cyc. 825. The temporary injunction was dissolved, and from such decree this appeal is prosecuted.

A consideration of the equity of the bill may be pretermitted. The mandamus case has this day been decided adversely to appellant (State ex rel. Eugene L. King et al. v. County Board of Education of Russell County [Ala. Sup.] 108 So. 588 1 ), and, very'clearly, the chancellor will not be put in error under these circumstances for dissolving the injunction (Donovan v. McCord, 204 Ala. 292, 85 So. 262). Its dissolution seems also to have been justified by the answer and proof offered on the hearing.

Let the decree be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.
1

Post, p. 620.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phenix City v. County Board of Education, 108 So. 589, 214 Ala. 432, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 126 (Ala. 1926).

108 So. 589 (Phenix City v. County Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. Board of Education of Geneva County
16 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)