Phenix Bank in Connecticut v. Sullivan
26 Mass. 410
Opinion
We are of opinion that the plaintiffs have no right to become parties to the indenture, the six months having expired before they made application for that purpose. The property is assigned, through the trustees, to the creditors who executed the instrument seasonably. Public notice was given, so that all the creditors might have an opportunity of sharing in [419] the trust fund. The plaintiffs had an agent in Boston who had control of this particular demand, and they must have had notice of the assignment.1
Bill dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phenix Bank in Connecticut v. Sullivan, 26 Mass. 410 (Mass. 1830).
26 Mass. 410 (Phenix Bank in Connecticut v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Caters v. Le Ray De Chaumont & Kanady
2 Paige Ch. 490 (New York Court of Chancery, 1831)
Coe v. Hutton
1 Serg. & Rawle 398 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1815)