Phelps v. Weaver

Fourth Circuit

Phelps v. Weaver

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 7, 2005

Docket04-7741

StatusUnpublished

This text of Phelps v. Weaver (Phelps v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phelps v. Weaver, (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7741

COY RAY PHELPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANGELA WALDEN WEAVER; CHARLES GRIFFIN; CHARLENE HARRIS; ROBERT LUCKING, Dr.; ARTHUR BEELER; BRUCE CAPEHART, Dr.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-04-439-1)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 7, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Coy Ray Phelps, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Coy Ray Phelps appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

Our review of the record and the district court’s order adopting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Phelps v. Weaver, No. CA-04-439-1 (M.D.N.C.

Oct. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI