Phelps v. Weaver

Fourth Circuit

Phelps v. Weaver

120 F. App'x 989

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2005·No. No. 04-7741·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Coy Ray Phelps appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Phelps v. Weaver, No. CA-04-439-1, 2004 WL 2597799 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Coy Ray Phelps appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Phelps v. Weaver, No. CA-04-439-1, 2004 WL 2597799 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Phelps v. Weaver, 120 F. App'x 989 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 989 (Phelps v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related