Phelps v. State

47 S.W.2d 297, 120 Tex. Crim. 413, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 301
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phelps v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Tex. Crim. 659
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 2, 1932·No. No. 15172·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for murder, punishment being twelve years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without statement of facts. The only bill of exception complains of the refusal of a continuance based on the absence of a witness. It is manifestly impossible for this court to appraise the materiality or otherwise determine the admissibility of the expected evidence of .the absent witness without having before us the facts developed on the trial, unless the bill should incorporate therein sufficient evidence or contain a certificate of sufficient facts to make it dear that the absent [414]*414testimony was material. No such showing is made in the present bill, and in this condition of the record we must assume that the action of the court in refusing the continuance was correct.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Morrow, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phelps v. State, 47 S.W.2d 297, 120 Tex. Crim. 413, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 301 (Tex. 1932).

47 S.W.2d 297 (Phelps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.