Phelps v. State
This text of 1926 OK CR 110 (Phelps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
G. H. Phelps, plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, was found guilty of the illegal sale of a pint of whisky, with his punishment fixed by the jury at confinement in jail for four months and to pay a fine of $400.
This conviction rests entirely upon the testimony of B. E. Slagle, a deputy sheriff, who claims he purchased the whisky in question from the defendant. Other witnesses there present, as well as the defendant, say that no such transaction took place. Without going into details, we hold that the evidence as a whole is insufficient to support the verdict.
The cause is reversed, with instructions to dismiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1926 OK CR 110, 244 P. 453, 33 Okla. Crim. 380, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.