Phelps v. State

603 S.E.2d 236, 278 Ga. 402, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3142, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 795
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 2004
DocketS04A0704
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 603 S.E.2d 236 (Phelps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phelps v. State, 603 S.E.2d 236, 278 Ga. 402, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3142, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 795 (Ga. 2004).

Opinion

Fletcher, Chief Justice.

William Herbert Phelps was convicted of malice murder and concealing a death in connection with the beating death of Jeffrey Valdez.1 Phelps appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient. Because the record demonstrates that the evidence was sufficient, we affirm.

The evidence at trial showed that Phelps and the victim went to a club on July 17,1999. They returned to Phelps’s sister’s apartment, where they slept. The next day, Phelps told his sister that some money was missing from his pockets and he suspected that the victim had taken it. Phelps’s sister told Phelps he could not fight the victim in her apartment. Phelps’s sister agreed to drive Phelps and the victim to another location so Phelps could confront the victim. The victim agreed to go for a ride, not knowing the purpose. The three drove around awhile, parked by a hunting preserve, and walked down a dirt path about a mile. Phelps took a rock and began beating the victim in the head, and continued to throw the rock at the victim’s head while the victim lay on the ground. Phelps searched the victim for the missing money and then dragged the body into the woods. Phelps’s sister testified that when they left the victim, he was still alive. Phelps and his sister returned to her apartment, drove the victim’s truck to a parking lot, and threw away his keys, wallet and pager. The victim’s extensively decomposed body was found a few weeks later.

1. Phelps argues on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to conclude that the beating was the sole proximate cause of the victim’s death. The medical examiner, however, testified that the cause of [403]*403death was blunt force injuries to the head. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that any rational trier of fact could have found Phelps guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of malice murder and that the evidence was sufficient to exclude any other reasonable hypothesis.2

Decided September 27, 2004. John T. Strauss, for appellant. W. Kendall Wynne, Jr., District Attorney, Alan C. Cook, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Chad E. Jacobs, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

2. Phelps also contends that the evidence is insufficient to establish the crime of concealing a death. To be guilty of concealing a death, there must be proof that the defendant hindered the discovery of whether the victim was unlawfully killed.3 The evidence here established that Phelps severely beat the victim and dragged him into the woods, where he would not be easily discovered. We conclude that any rational trier of fact could have found Phelps guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of concealing a death.4

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
699 S.E.2d 291 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 S.E.2d 236, 278 Ga. 402, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3142, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-state-ga-2004.